Map the current process
We identify the trigger, source of truth, decisions, exceptions and owner. Baseline active preparation and review effort separately from elapsed waiting.
The work is complete when people can use, review and take responsibility for the system.
We identify the trigger, source of truth, decisions, exceptions and owner. Baseline active preparation and review effort separately from elapsed waiting.
We compare the proposed workflow with a simpler template, current software or manual process. Missing information and failed cases stay visible.
The implementation agreement defines deliverables, verified integrations, client responsibilities, review boundaries, acceptance, change control and handover.
Users learn normal operation, exceptions, escalation and the manual fallback. Access and operating documentation belong in the client's approved environment.
Monitoring, review hours, response windows, included changes and vendor costs are written down. Larger changes receive their own scope.
Map inputs, decisions, handoffs and the cost of the current process.
Use permitted examples and agreed tests to challenge quality and review effort.
Build the agreed scope, document it and train the people who will use it.
Review exceptions, costs and adoption under a separately defined support scope.